« Jerry Fodor Caused This Post | Main | Alienation and the Private Dick »

January 17, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Robert Link

I prefer a less common-sense oriented answer: deconstruct "to understand." Given that the deconstruction allows for a wide range of qualifying acts, Searle in his Chinese Room might best be argued as exhibiting one kind of understanding.

But wait...

"...hackers who anthropomorphize are expressing not a vitalistic view of program behavior but a mechanistic view of human behavior."

In that context, I'd say, "Sure, Searle in his CR 'understands' the input and has passed the Turing test. Big deal. Like, us meat-machines are so different?"

Peace.

The comments to this entry are closed.

New Digs: STRANGE DOCTRINES

Those Belonging to the Emperor

Suckling Pigs

Those Drawn with a Very Fine Camel Hair Brush

Others

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 11/2005